Strait of Malacca

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Jump to: navigation, search
This wide-angle map of south-east Asia shows that the Strait is the most direct route from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific. The narrowness of the Strait makes it a pinch point for world shipping.
Enlarge
This wide-angle map of south-east Asia shows that the Strait is the most direct route from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific. The narrowness of the Strait makes it a pinch point for world shipping.
The Strait of Malacca separates Sumatra from the Malay Peninsula
Enlarge
The Strait of Malacca separates Sumatra from the Malay Peninsula
Yearly smoky haze choking Straits
Enlarge
Yearly smoky haze choking Straits
A closer-up map shows that the Strait of  Malacca separating peninsular Malaysia and the Indonesian island of Sumatra.
Enlarge
A closer-up map shows that the Strait of Malacca separating peninsular Malaysia and the Indonesian island of Sumatra.

The Strait of Malacca (also called the Straits of Malacca, and in Malay Selat Melaka) is a narrow stretch of water between Peninsular Malaysia (West Malaysia) and the Indonesian island of Sumatra.

Contents

Economic importance of the Strait

From an economic and strategic perspective the Strait of Malacca is one of the most important shipping lanes in the world, an equivalent of the Suez Canal, or the Panama Canal. The Strait forms the main ship passageway between the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, linking three of the world's most populous nations: India, Indonesia and China. The Strait carries 50,000 vessels per year, carrying between one-fifth and one quarter of the world's sea trade. Half of all oil shipments carried by sea come through the Strait, in 2003, an estimated 11 million barrels (1,700,000 m³) a day, a trade that is expected to expand as oil consumption rises in China. At Phillips Channel near Singapore, the 805 km (500 mile) channel is only 1.5 nautical miles (2.8 km) wide at its narrowest point. This creates one of the world's most significant traffic bottlenecks [1].

All these factors have caused the area to become a target for piracy and a perceived target for terrorism. Piracy has been a considerable problem in the Strait in recent years, rising from around 25 attacks in 1994 to a record 220 in 2000. Just over 150 attacks were carried out in 2003. This accounted for around one-third of all piracy in 2003.

The number of attacks rose again in the first half of 2004, and the total number is expected to top the 2000 record. In response to the rising crisis, the Malaysian, Indonesian and Singaporean navies stepped up their patrols of the area in July 2004.

Fears of terrorism rest on the possibility that a large ship could be pirated and sunk at a shallow point in the Strait (it is just 25m deep at its shallowest part), effectively blocking the Strait. If successfully achieved, the attack would have a devastating effect on world trade. Opinions amongst security specialists differ about the feasibility and likelihood of such an attack.

Another shipping risk in the Straits is the yearly haze that persists due to raging bush fires in Sumatra. The haze can literally choke shipping by reducing visibility to as low as 200m making navigation in such a narrow and busy trade route hazardous.

There is also the perceived risk that terrorist or pirates could make use of the cover of haze to their advantage in launching operations.

Proposals to relieve the Strait

Thailand has developed several plans that if implemented would diminish the economic significance of the Strait. The Thai government has over the course of its history several times proposed to cut a canal through the Isthmus of Kra, shaving around 600 miles from the journey from Africa and the Middle East to the Pacific. This would effectively cut Thailand in two, further isolating the separatist Muslim majority in Pattani. The prohibitive financial and ecological costs suggest that no such canal will go ahead in the near future despite the backing of several Thai politicians, and according to a report leaked to The Washington Times in 2004, the offer by China to underwrite the costs of the canal. A second alternative is to build a pipeline across the isthmus to carry oil to ships waiting on the other side. Proponents of the plan say it would cut the cost of oil delivery to Asia by about $0.50/barrel ($3/m³).

Myanmar has also made a similar pipeline proposal.

Finally, there is also a proposal to directly pipe crude from the Middle East to Xinjiang, China. Building began in October 2004.

See also

References

External links

Personal tools